The film Adipurush has attracted much attention since it was announced. Produced by Om Raut the film is an adaptation of one of the most famous legends of Indian mythology, namely the Ramayana. The film stars Bollywood actor Prabhas as the main character as Lord Rama The trailer of this film already caused some buzz on the internet. But, a debate has erupted due to an assertion in the trailer about the birthplace for Lord Rama’s spouse Sita. In the trailer for Adipurush, Sita is referred to as the “daughter of India’. The reference to Sita’s birthplace has angered many in Nepal since it is believed that she was been born in the country’s Janakpur. This has led to a massive protest from Nepalese residents and political leaders who have demanded an apology from film makers.
Kathmandu Metropolitan City Mayor Balen Shah is the most vocal voice in this dispute. Balen Shah has stated that if the film doesn’t correct the’mistake and acknowledge Sita’s genuine roots the film will not be shown in Kathmandu. Indian movie will ever be shown in the capital region of Nepal. He also has criticized the depiction of the ‘conquest mindset that is depicted in the film which he believes is detrimental to relationships with Nepal as well as India.
Adipurush Dialogue Meme Trolls
This debate illustrates the fragile character of the historical and cultural references within the film. Although it may appear to be something minor to some people, the manner in which characters and events are presented can have a major influence on how people view these characters and the events. With regard to Adipurush the film makers may have accidentally caused a stir in the entire country by calling Sita in the form of an Indian instead of being a Nepalese. But it’s important to note it is the Ramayana is a classic that is revered throughout a large portion in Southeast Asia, and as so, it’s not surprising that many have a strong affinity for the protagonists and the themes.
The controversy over Adipurush serves as an example of how filmmakers should be cautious when working with the past and culture in their films. While it’s impossible to please everyone, it’s essential to take note of the potential impact minor details could affect the wider public. We hope that the film makers be aware of this critique and make changes to any perceived errors or flaws prior to the release of the film. It is our hope that this controversy will lead to better filmmaking in the coming years.
