The news is by your side.

Skip Bayless, everlasting heel, says Jalen Suggs’ Closing 4 buzzer-beater was ‘pure luck’



Gonzaga freshman Jalen Suggs delivered one of many prime pictures in March Insanity historical past on Saturday, banking a halfcourt, buzzer-beating 3 off the glass to present the top-seeded Bulldogs a 93-90 time beyond regulation win in opposition to 11-seed UCLA within the Closing 4.

The shot was wonderful, no doubt. Additionally think about the time left on the clock (3.3 seconds when Gonzaga inbounded the ball), the Closing 4 stage and back-and-forth nature of the sport, and plenty of will rely this matchup among the many biggest in NCAA Match historical past.

Everlasting heel and persistent contrarian Skip Bayless, nevertheless, didn’t maintain that opinion. Quite the opposite, the “Skip and Shannon: Undisputed” co-host referred to as the shot nothing greater than “pure luck,” including later that, for that motive, the sport could not be thought of an all-time nice one.

MORE MARCH MADNESS: Dwell scores | Up to date bracket | TV schedule

Only for clarification, Bayless was unimpressed by this shot:

There’s actually nothing to say about Bayless’ opinion. He is dedicated to a bit, one which pays properly and locations him within the information even when he is not doing something significantly newsworthy. However only for the sake of posterity, let’s observe {that a} “fortunate” shot doesn’t detract from the greatness of this Closing 4 matchup — it solely provides to it. Another opinion is asinine.

Say the shot was simply “fortunate.” Does that take away from Jaime Jaquez Jr. tying the sport with a putback with 3.3 seconds left in time beyond regulation? Does it take away from Drew Timme, with 4 fouls, drawing a cost on Johnny Juzang with 1.1 seconds in regulation on a would-be lead-changing Bruins possession? Does it take away from Suggs’ unbelievable sequence the place he blocked a Cody Riley dunk try after which dished a half-court bounce cross to Timme for a dunk? Does it take away from Juzang’s game-high 29 factors on 12-of-18 taking pictures? Or the 19 lead modifications, or the truth that no staff led by greater than seven factors?

The solutions to these questions, so as: No, no, no, no, no and no.

Twitter roundly criticized Bayless for his scorching scorching take. Listed below are a number of memorable entries:


Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.